Can 3D Printing Turn Space-Based Solar into a Reality?

Space based solar power has been a futuristic fantasy since the 1970s but the advent of 21^st century 3D printing may bring it a step closer to reality.

“The overall vision is to create a ‘satellite chrysalis’ with compact, durable ‘software DNA’ assembly instructions, and the ability to fabricate space system components on-orbit instead of building them on the ground,” explained start-up Tethers Unlimited, Inc., CEO and Chief Scientist Rob Hoyt.

TUI has won two rounds of funding for its SpiderFab 3D robotic printer from the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program. A $100,000 award allowed proving of the technical feasibility and value proposition of the technologies and won TUI a $500,000 award to continue development.

“Our analysis shows we can get orders of magnitude improvement in the stowed volume and mass of space systems,” Hoyt said. The transport of compact materials instead of bulky finished products, “could reduce stowed volume ten-fold and mass by 50 percent to 80 percent.”

3D printing and robotic construction of components on-orbit would allow a smaller, less expensive launch rocket that will “improve performance per cost by orders of magnitude,” Hoyt believes.

Once in space, TUI’s Trusselator, the first step in the SpiderFab architecture, would use 3D printing techniques and robotic assembly “to fabricate long, high-performance truss structures.” These would be the supports for system components. It would “enable construction of large support structures for systems such as multi-hundred-kilowatt solar arrays, large solar sails, and football-field sized antennas.”

For space based solar power (SBSP), there would be two basic steps, Hoyt explained. First, the 3D printer would build a carbon fiber truss structure that would act as a frame for the system. It would then lay a membrane on the structure of either thin film PV or of reflecting materials, if concentrating solar power was being deployed.

 “We haven’t yet looked in detail at space based solar,” Hoyt said. But a just-completed design analysis for a 300 kilowatt orbital solar array verified that SpiderFab can provide the projected tenfold decrease in stowed volume and 50 percent to 80 percent reduced mass.

TUI also developed a lab version of the device that would fabricate the truss structure in that analysis.

“Geostationary solar could produce base load electricity for 99 percent of the hours of the year,” explained NASA Apollo 11 lunar landing vehicle manager Hubert Davis, a member of the Solar High Study Group of nine former NASA and Apollo program scientists and retired military leaders that advocate for SBSP.

Terrestrial solar arrays have achieved grid parity, Davis said, but without storage they cannot provide the base load power utilities need. And the cost of storage to provide that service will “double or triple our electricity rates.”

The Solar High Group is working “to put together a consortium of government and industry,” Davis said. The first step would be funding to update the Boeing/North American Aviation studies done in the 1970s. They looked at technology feasibility, environmental impact, land use, manpower needs, energy payback, and estimated costs and confirmed the concept was “technically feasible with no new science” but found it would be too expensive.

Cost has been a major obstacle to the Solaren Corporation’s efforts to commercialize SBSP. The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency has also worked on it.  

The delivered cost of power from SBSP, according to August 2012 calculations by NASA Apollo program engineer Philip Chapman, would be $0.10 per kilowatt-hour to $0.11 per kilowatt-hour.

At scale, the launch cost would be between $0.008 per kilowatt-hour and $0.023 per kilowatt-hour of the delivered cost, according to Chapman’s July 2013 update.

With the reductions in volume and mass promised by 3D printing, those launch costs could be significantly reduced, though Hoyt could not comment specifically on SBSP and Davis’s group has not yet considered the impact of the TUI technologies.

Cost is not the only challenge SBSP faces.

“Safety is the second most prevalent objection,” Solar High acknowledges. The microwave transmission that would deliver SBSP’s electricity from an orbiting antenna to terrestrial rectennas would be “two million times the power of that produced by the microwave oven.”

But the maximum radio frequency intensity of the transmission “is only one-fourth that of sunlight,” according to former NASA wireless power transmission engineer Richard Dickinson. And the transmitter would be immediately shut down if there was any interruption at the earth station. “Aircraft can safely traverse the beam and tests have demonstrated that even the sensitive honeybee is unaffected,” Davis said.

The two "real reasons" nobody has moved ahead with SBSP, Davis explained, are

“The term 3D printing has become a catch-all for a number of purposes and different technologies evolving rapidly to do all kinds of things,” Hoyt explained.

Boeing and GE are developing the capability to 3D print aircraft components, he said, and smaller-scale applications are beginning to enter manufacturers’ supply chains.

“Given the way NASA is funded, SpiderFab is three years to five years out,” Hoyt said. “We will have to develop our process incrementally and demonstrate our reliability.”

But “on-orbit fabrication with SpiderFab,” a TUI presentation promises, “will enable NASA to accomplish ten times more science-per-dollar.” 

Greentech Media (GTM) produces industry-leading news, research, and conferences in the business-to-business greentech market. Our coverage areas include solar, smart grid, energy efficiency, wind, and other non-incumbent energy markets. For more information, visit: greentechmedia.com , follow us on twitter: @greentechmedia, or like us on Facebook: facebook.com/greentechmedia.